filmbriefs
all subjects →
13:00in productionCh. 1 · A favourite toy who is no longer anyone's favourite/ 13:00 · ceiling 15 min
Animation · Comedy

Toy Story 4

Pixar closed out Woody's story a second time, nine years after Toy Story 3 already ended it, by asking whether a toy's whole purpose can survive discovering that being chosen by a child is not the only way to matter.

Woody, no longer Bonnie's favourite toy, follows a homemade spork named Forky on a road trip and is reunited with the long-lost Bo Peep, who has built an independent life as a lost toy rather than an owned one. Josh Cooley, who replaced original director John Lasseter partway through a lengthy development process, uses that reunion to reopen a question Toy Story 3 seemed to have already settled: what a toy is actually for once being loved by a child stops being guaranteed.

Chapters & takeaways7
  1. 0:08
    A favourite toy who is no longer anyone's favourite

    Woody, sidelined as Bonnie plays with other toys instead of him, attaches himself to Forky, a homemade spork Bonnie made at school, largely to still feel useful to a child who does not need him the way Andy once did.

  2. 1:51
    A reunion with a toy who chose not to be owned

    A carnival stop reunites Woody with Bo Peep, missing since being given away years earlier, who has spent the intervening time as a self-sufficient lost toy rather than seeking a new owner, unsettling everything Woody has always assumed about a toy's purpose.

  3. 3:43
    A road trip structured around rescue set pieces

    Retrieving Forky from an antique shop guarded by a damaged doll named Gabby Gabby, and later reaching a carnival, gives the film's middle stretch a series of tense, well-built action sequences built around genuine physical stakes for toys.

  4. 5:34
    A crowded supporting cast thinning out the emotional core

    New characters including Ducky, Bunny, and Duke Caboom add comic material but spread the film's attention away from the central Woody-Bo Peep question, and some stretches feel more like an ensemble comedy than the introspective film the premise sets up.

  5. 7:26
    Belonging redefined away from ownership

    The film's real argument is that being owned by a child is one way for a toy to matter but not the only one, a genuinely difficult idea for a franchise that spent three films treating a child's love as a toy's entire purpose.

  6. 9:17
    An ending built for adults who grew up on the earlier films

    Children get an adventure with a talking spork, but the ending's weight, a toy choosing to leave the world the whole series was built around, lands mainly on the adults who followed Woody across two decades of films.

  7. 11:09
    A hundred minutes that risked the franchise's ending to ask one more question

    Grossing over a billion dollars and winning a second Academy Award for the series, it justifies revisiting an apparently finished story by having something genuinely unresolved left to say about it.

Worth your time?

Yes. Watch the whole thing.

4/ 5
What works
  • the Bo Peep reunion and her independence from ownership
  • the Gabby Gabby rescue sequence
  • the film's willingness to end without full reassurance
  • Tom Hanks and Annie Potts's performances
What does not
  • the expanded cast dilutes focus on the central relationship
  • some sequences feel more like ensemble comedy than the introspective story the premise promises
Watch it if
  • longtime viewers of the Toy Story series
  • adults interested in how a franchise can reopen a settled ending without cheapening it
  • families wanting a well-built adventure with real stakes
Skip it if
  • viewers who consider Toy Story 3 the series' proper ending and prefer it undisturbed
  • anyone wanting a tighter cast rather than an expanding ensemble
The written brief4 min read

A favourite toy who is no longer anyone’s favourite

Toy Story 4 finds Woody displaced from his old position as Andy’s favourite toy, now largely ignored by his new owner Bonnie in favour of other toys, and compensating by attaching himself to Forky, a spork Bonnie fashioned into a toy at school and who is having an existential crisis over being considered a toy at all. Development on the film began shortly after Toy Story 3’s 2010 release and went through years of revision, with original director John Lasseter’s treatment eventually reworked by Josh Cooley, who took over as director in 2016 and reconceived both the story and the purpose of bringing Bo Peep back into it.

A reunion with a toy who chose not to be owned

A carnival stop during Bonnie’s family road trip brings Woody back into contact with Bo Peep, missing since being given away years before the events of Toy Story 3, who has spent the intervening time as a self-sufficient lost toy moving between owners and locations rather than seeking a permanent home. Her independence directly contradicts everything Woody has organised his identity around, that a toy’s purpose is to be owned and loved by a specific child, and the tension between his worldview and her lived alternative becomes the film’s actual emotional engine beneath its adventure plot.

A road trip structured around rescue set pieces

The film’s middle section builds two substantial rescue sequences, first retrieving Forky from an antique shop guarded by Gabby Gabby, a damaged pull-string doll who wants Woody’s voice box for herself, and later a carnival-set retrieval involving Duke Caboom, a failed stunt-toy voiced by Keanu Reeves. These sequences carry genuine physical stakes and tension, giving the film’s pacing real momentum in stretches that could otherwise have felt like connective tissue between the character-driven scenes on either side of them, and the antique shop in particular functions as a small horror set piece built entirely from toys.

A crowded supporting cast thinning out the emotional core

New characters including the carnival prize toys Ducky and Bunny, and Duke Caboom, contribute comic material and, according to director Cooley, more story motivation than pure comic relief, but their combined presence spreads the film’s attention across a wider ensemble than the central Woody-Bo Peep question strictly needs. Certain stretches, particularly around the carnival set pieces, read more as ensemble comedy than the more introspective, two-hander film the film’s premise otherwise sets up, and the tonal balance between the two registers is not always even across the full runtime, with the film’s funniest material occasionally arriving at the expense of its own momentum.

Belonging redefined away from ownership

The film’s real argument, articulated through Bo Peep’s example rather than through dialogue stating it outright, is that being chosen and owned by a child is one way for a toy to matter but not the only one, a genuinely difficult proposition for a franchise built across three prior films on the premise that a child’s love is a toy’s entire purpose. Tim Allen has said the film’s ending was emotional enough that he struggled to get through the final scene, and that difficulty reflects how much weight the film puts on unsettling an idea the series had previously treated as settled.

An ending built for adults who grew up on the earlier films

Children will follow the road-trip adventure and Forky’s comic existential panic without needing the underlying philosophical question to land, but the ending’s actual weight, a toy choosing to leave the entire framework the series has operated within since 1995, is aimed squarely at adults who have followed Woody across two decades of films. It is a rare sequel that assumes its emotional stakes will register more with the audience that grew up alongside the franchise than with the children currently watching it for the first time, which is either a mark of confidence or a slight miscalibration depending on who is in the room.

A hundred minutes that risked the franchise’s ending to ask one more question

Toy Story 4 grossed over a billion dollars worldwide, becoming the highest-grossing film in the franchise, and won the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, its second for the series. At a hundred minutes, it justifies revisiting a story Toy Story 3 had already closed by having something genuinely unresolved left to explore in it, rather than simply extending the franchise for its own sake, and that justification is what makes it worth the evening even for viewers who considered the earlier film’s ending sufficient on its own terms and were not looking for the series to continue any further.

Same shelf · Animation4 of 95
Up next in Film

Unforgiven

Clint Eastwood · 1992 · 13:00

Clint Eastwood plays a gunfighter's old age as sickness and dread rather than nerve rediscovered, and makes every killing in the film cost something.

13:00