filmbriefs
13:00in productionCh. 1 · Eight years to get made/ 13:00 · ceiling 15 min
War · Drama

Come and See

Elem Klimov waited eight years for permission to make this and used every day of it: a boy watches the German occupation of Belarus up close until his face stops looking like a child's.

Elem Klimov's 1985 account of the Nazi destruction of Belarusian villages follows a teenage partisan recruit, played by Aleksei Kravchenko, through a descent that the director shot in sequence and largely with non-actors. Built from survivor testimony and a Belarusian novel, and delayed for years by Soviet censors who found the script too raw, it remains one of the starkest war films made anywhere.

Chapters & takeaways7
  1. 0:08
    Eight years to get made

    Klimov and co-writer Ales Adamovich built the script from real survivor testimony, and Soviet censors blocked it for years as too extreme.

  2. 1:51
    One boy, shot in order, mostly without actors

    Aleksei Kravchenko, fourteen when cast, carries a chronologically filmed production surrounded largely by non-professional performers.

  3. 3:43
    Sound and light doing the damage

    Rodionov's close-ups and Steadicam work, live ammunition on set, and jarring musical cues from Mozart to Wagner create a disorientation words can't match.

  4. 5:34
    The limits of watching this twice

    The film's refusal to look away is also what makes it a one-sitting experience for most people who see it.

  5. 7:26
    Occupation, atrocity, and a boy's aging face

    The film measures the war not in territory but in what it does to Flyora's expression across 146 minutes.

  6. 9:17
    Who needs to see this and who should wait

    It belongs to serious students of war cinema and history; it is not for anyone seeking a night's entertainment.

  7. 11:09
    Whether to spend an evening here

    It demands more than most films ask and gives back an understanding of atrocity no summary can provide.

Worth your time?

Selectively. Start with the brief, then watch the parts we point at.

5/ 5
What works
  • Kravchenko's transformation across the runtime
  • Rodionov's disorienting camerawork
  • The refusal to soften the historical record
  • The use of classical music as ironic counterpoint
What does not
  • Nothing about it is designed for repeat viewing
  • Its intensity leaves little room for nuance in individual scenes
Watch it if
  • Serious students of war cinema
  • Readers of Belarusian and Eastern Front history
  • Anyone prepared for a genuinely harrowing film
Skip it if
  • Casual viewers wanting an evening's entertainment
  • Anyone sensitive to depictions of mass violence
The written brief4 min read

Eight years to get made

Come and See is Elem Klimov’s account of what German occupation did to Belarus between 1941 and 1944, told through a teenage boy named Flyora who joins a partisan unit and finds a war nothing like the one he imagined. Klimov and his co-writer Ales Adamovich, who had fought with real partisans as a teenager himself, built the script from survivor testimony collected in a Belarusian oral history and from a novel about the wartime destruction of the village of Khatyn. Soviet authorities rejected the screenplay for eight years, calling it too naturalistic, before finally allowing production in 1984. The film that resulted doesn’t dramatise the war so much as document what it would feel like to be caught inside it.

One boy, shot in order, mostly without actors

Aleksei Kravchenko was fourteen when Klimov cast him as Flyora, and the production shot in strict chronological order so his exhaustion and horror could build for real rather than being performed out of sequence. Almost nobody else on screen is a professional actor. Cinematographer Aleksey Rodionov worked in extreme close-up for much of the film, tracking faces at a distance that leaves nowhere to hide, and the production used live ammunition rather than blanks during combat sequences, with bullets reportedly passing within inches of Kravchenko during one scene. Oleg Yanchenko’s score sits alongside German and Austrian classical pieces, including a Strauss waltz and Wagner’s Ride of the Valkyries, deployed against the violence rather than beneath it.

Sound and light doing the damage

The close-ups are the film’s most effective tool: Kravchenko’s face, filmed almost continuously, ages from boy to something unrecognisable well before the story’s midpoint, and the camera never lets you look elsewhere. The use of Mozart’s Lacrimosa in the closing minutes, arriving after nearly two and a half hours of horror, produces an effect no dialogue could, a beauty the character has clearly never had access to, dropped into the film almost as a taunt. The mix of documentary-style violence with these deliberately unreal musical intrusions gives the film a register unlike most war cinema, closer to a fever than a narrative.

The limits of watching this twice

There is very little relief built into the film, and that is by design rather than oversight, but it means Come and See offers almost nothing in the way of pacing or structure to hold onto. Scenes of atrocity accumulate rather than build toward a dramatic turn, and viewers looking for character development beyond Flyora’s disintegration will find the surrounding cast sketched only lightly, which is true to the film’s method but limits how much insight it offers into anyone besides its lead. The film’s commitment to unflinching realism, while its whole reason for existing, also means it offers no vantage point outside the horror from which to make sense of it.

Occupation, atrocity, and a boy’s aging face

The film’s subject is the Nazi destruction of Belarusian villages, but its real interest is what sustained exposure to that destruction does to a person too young to have built any defence against it. Flyora doesn’t become brave or wise; he becomes unable to process what he has witnessed, and the film tracks that unravelling through his face rather than through anything he says. Adamovich reportedly told Klimov that if audiences couldn’t bear to watch it, that refusal was itself part of the point, a document left behind as both evidence and warning. The film treats atrocity as something to be witnessed at full weight, not narrated at a safe remove.

Who needs to see this and who should wait

This is a film for people who want to understand the Eastern Front’s civilian cost in a way that history books alone can’t convey, and for viewers already familiar with war cinema who are ready for something considerably starker than the genre’s usual entries. It is not for anyone looking for an evening’s diversion, and it should be approached cautiously by anyone who finds depictions of mass violence against civilians genuinely distressing rather than merely unpleasant. There is no ironic distance offered here, no relief valve; the film asks you to sit inside its subject matter directly, and that is either exactly what you’re looking for or a reason to choose something else tonight.

Whether to spend an evening here

Come and See won the FIPRESCI prize at the Moscow International Film Festival on release and has only grown in stature since, placing in the top fifty of the Sight and Sound directors’ poll decades later. It was Klimov’s last film before his death in 2003, and the eight years he spent fighting for permission to make it are visible in the conviction of every frame. Watching it is not comfortable and isn’t meant to be, but it delivers something few films manage: a direct sense of what historical atrocity actually cost the people living through it. That makes it worth the evening, provided you choose the evening carefully.

Same strand · War4 of 103
13:00
The BridgeBernhard Wicki · 1959A 1959 West German war drama following seven teenage boys drafted into the Volkssturm during the final days of World War II. Assigned to defend a strategically irrelevant bridge near their hometown, they hold their position without orders, without support, and ultimately without survival. Directed by Bernhard Wicki from a novel by Gregor Dorfmeister, the film avoids rhetoric in favour of stark cause-and-effect, using restrained performances, muted cinematography, and deliberate pacing to convey the futility and horror of ideological surrender to youth.
13:00
The Deer HunterMichael Cimino · 1978The Deer Hunter follows three steelworkers from a Russian-American mill town through a wedding, a hunting trip, the Vietnam War, and its long aftermath. Michael Cimino's film, shot partly in Thailand and built around Robert De Niro, Christopher Walken and John Savage, uses an unusually long, unhurried domestic opening to set up a war sequence built on captivity and Russian roulette, then spends its final third on men who came home changed in different, irreversible ways.
13:00
The Cranes Are FlyingMikhail Kalatozov · 1957Released in 1957 by Mosfilm, Mikhail Kalatozov’s The Cranes Are Flying follows Veronika, a young Moscow woman whose life fractures after the Nazi invasion. Her lover Boris goes to war, her parents die in an air raid, and she is pressured into marriage with his predatory cousin Mark. Through trauma, silence, and small acts of remembrance—the squirrel toy, Boris’s hidden note—the film charts her slow, unheroic return to life. It won the Palme d’Or in 1958 and remains a landmark of Soviet cinematic humanism.
13:00
Grave of the FirefliesIsao Takahata · 1988Isao Takahata's 1988 adaptation of Akiyuki Nosaka's semi-autobiographical story follows siblings Seita and Setsuko trying to survive the final months of the Pacific War after the firebombing of Kobe and their mother's death. Takahata's first film for Studio Ghibli, it opens by revealing Seita is already dead and builds the rest of its account around a specific, unheroic failure rather than a rescue.
Up next in Film

Coraline

Henry Selick · 2009 · 13:00

Henry Selick's stop-motion adaptation of Neil Gaiman treats a child's wish for more attentive parents as the exact hook a predator would use, and follows that logic without flinching.

13:00