filmbriefs
all subjects →
13:00in productionCh. 1 · A rat with a chef's nose/ 13:00 · ceiling 15 min
Animation · Comedy

Ratatouille

A rat who can cook and a boy who cannot is a joke Pixar keeps straight-faced for two hours, and the film argues its case for who gets to be an artist mostly through how it animates food.

Remy, a rat with a chef's palate, teams up with a hapless kitchen boy to cook at a Paris restaurant neither of them is supposed to be running. Brad Bird's 2007 film pairs slapstick with unusually sincere arguments about taste, talent and where either one is allowed to come from.

Chapters & takeaways7
  1. 0:08
    A rat with a chef's nose

    Remy's exile from his rat colony over his refusal to eat garbage sets up the film's premise cleanly: a creature with real culinary talent stuck in a body that disqualifies him from ever using it.

  2. 1:51
    Puppeteering by hair-pull

    Remy directs the inept garbage boy Linguini's hands from under his toque, and the film gets sustained physical comedy out of two bodies working as one without ever losing the geography of the kitchen.

  3. 3:43
    Food shot to be believed

    Pixar sent animators to culinary school and consulted chefs including Thomas Keller so that the confit byaldi at the climax reads as something a real cook, not a computer, made.

  4. 5:34
    A critic given more to do than sneer

    Anton Ego is set up as a stock villain, a feared reviewer, and then given a monologue near the end that argues for the value of criticism itself, which is a bigger swing than the setup promised.

  5. 7:26
    Who is allowed to be good at something

    Bird rewrote the story to make Remy's exclusion the whole engine of the plot: a rat cannot legally be in a kitchen no matter how good the food is, and the film keeps returning to that fact rather than explaining it away.

  6. 9:17
    Who should watch it

    It suits families who don't mind a slower back half, adults who cook, and anyone curious about how Pixar solved the technical problem of making digital food look edible; small children impatient with talk-heavy stretches may drift during the restaurant politics.

  7. 11:09
    Is it worth the evening

    At 111 minutes with a script this attentive to craft and a score by Michael Giacchino built around its Paris setting, the film earns its Best Animated Feature Oscar and the $623.7 million it took worldwide against a $150 million budget.

Worth your time?

Yes. Watch the whole thing.

4.5/ 5
What works
  • the food animation
  • the Remy-Linguini physical comedy
  • Ego's late monologue
  • Giacchino's score
What does not
  • a slightly slack middle stretch of restaurant politics
Watch it if
  • families with older children
  • anyone interested in food or cooking
  • Pixar completists
  • viewers who like a film with an actual argument to make
Skip it if
  • very young children who want constant action
  • viewers allergic to sincerity about art and criticism
The written brief4 min read

A rat with a chef’s nose

Ratatouille, released by Pixar in 2007 and directed by Brad Bird after he took over from original director Jan Pinkava, is built on a premise its own characters call absurd: a rat named Remy has the palate and instincts of a serious chef, and wants to cook in a Paris kitchen, a place that by definition cannot have rats anywhere near it. Bird’s film spends its full runtime taking that contradiction seriously rather than playing it purely for gross-out laughs, which is the choice that separates it from what could easily have been a much lesser version of the same premise about a talking rat with a hobby.

Puppeteering by hair-pull

The mechanics of the plot hinge on Remy directing garbage boy Alfredo Linguini’s actions by pulling his hair from underneath his chef’s hat, a device that gives the film a sustained physical comedy engine distinct from most kitchen-set stories built around a single competent lead. Bird, who also wrote the final script, killed off the restaurant’s founder Gusteau early in his rewrite and expanded the roles of the sous-chef Skinner and the only woman on the line, Colette, sharpening a story that had been comparatively soft and unfocused under Pinkava’s earlier direction before Bird was brought in.

Food shot to be believed

The film’s most distinctive achievement is how it renders food on screen. Pixar sent animators to San Francisco-area culinary schools, brought in a professional-chef-trained sets and layout manager to consult across departments, and had producer Brad Lewis intern in Thomas Keller’s kitchen at The French Laundry, where Keller devised the layered vegetable dish, confit byaldi, that becomes the film’s climactic plate. The result is food animation that looks handled by someone who genuinely understands what makes a dish work as cooking, not merely what makes it look appetising and glossy on a screen.

A critic given more to do than sneer

Where the film sags is in its middle stretch of restaurant politics and health-inspector plotting, which slows the momentum the Remy-Linguini partnership had built in the opening act and takes longer than it strictly needs to get the story back into the kitchen where it is strongest. It is a minor drag rather than a serious structural flaw, but it is noticeably there on a second viewing, and a slightly tighter edit could plausibly have trimmed it without losing anything essential to the plot. Skinner’s scheme to profit off Gusteau’s name and Colette’s suspicion of Linguini both need explaining before the film can return to what it does best.

Who is allowed to be good at something

The film’s real subject is who gets permission to be an artist, and it refuses easy answers on the question: Remy’s talent is never actually in doubt, but his species remains a real, unresolved practical obstacle the film does not paper over with a convenient magic fix at any point. That argument crystallises late, when the feared critic Anton Ego, having spent the entire film as a looming offscreen threat, delivers a monologue defending the value of honest criticism and the possibility that great cooking can come from anywhere at all, including, as the film’s closing narration insists, from a rat.

Who should watch it

It suits families with children old enough to sit through some dialogue-heavy stretches, adults who cook or otherwise care seriously about food, and anyone curious how a major studio solved the technical problem of making computer-generated food look like something a person would actually want to eat. Very young viewers wanting nonstop slapstick may find the restaurant-politics section slow going, since this is not a film built around large set-piece action or chase sequences to hold attention between the comedy. Viewers who already dislike rats as a matter of personal taste should know that the film does not shy away from showing large numbers of them at once.

Is it worth the evening

At 111 minutes, with Michael Giacchino’s Paris-inflected score and a screenplay willing to let its ostensible villain have the last serious word in the film, Ratatouille backs up its acclaim with results: it won the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, took $623.7 million worldwide against a $150 million production budget, and has aged into a film critics still regularly cite as one of the strongest of its entire decade of animation. A 2016 BBC poll of international critics later placed it among the hundred greatest films of the twenty-first century, which is a rare honour for something originally sold as a family cartoon. It is worth the evening, restaurant-politics stretch and all.

Same shelf · Animation4 of 95
Up next in Film

Rear Window

Alfred Hitchcock · 1954 · 13:00

Hitchcock built an entire courtyard on one Paramount soundstage so a man in a wheelchair could watch it for two hours. The confinement is the whole engine of the film.

13:00