filmbriefs
all subjects →
13:00in productionCh. 1 · A memoir turned into a study of temper/ 13:00 · ceiling 15 min
Drama

Raging Bull

A boxer who can absorb any punch in the ring cannot stop swinging at the people who actually love him, and the film never once excuses it.

Martin Scorsese's 1980 film adapts former middleweight champion Jake LaMotta's own memoir into a study of a man whose jealousy and temper wreck his marriage and his relationship with his brother and manager Joey at the same rate his boxing career rises and falls. Shot in black and white, partly because research showed period boxing gloves came in too narrow a range of colours to justify colour film, and built around a physical transformation in which Robert De Niro gained roughly 60 pounds to play LaMotta's later years, the film returned only a modest $23.4 million against its $18 million budget on release but later won Oscars for De Niro's performance and Thelma Schoonmaker's editing.

Chapters & takeaways7
  1. 0:08
    A memoir turned into a study of temper

    Adapted from LaMotta's own book, the film treats his boxing record as secondary to the jealousy that governs every relationship around him.

  2. 1:51
    Black and white chosen for a period reason

    Scorsese shot in monochrome partly because research showed 1940s boxing gloves came in too narrow a range of colours to justify shooting on colour stock.

  3. 3:43
    A body rebuilt for one performance

    De Niro trained as an amateur boxer for the fight scenes, then gained around 60 pounds to play LaMotta's heavier, retired later years.

  4. 5:34
    A brother pushed past what loyalty can absorb

    Joey manages Jake's career and absorbs his outbursts for years before a single unfounded accusation ends the relationship for good.

  5. 7:26
    Where the film keeps its distance

    LaMotta's cruelty toward his wife Vickie is shown at length with little access to her own perspective on enduring it.

  6. 9:17
    Punishing rather than crowd-pleasing

    Its violence, both in and out of the ring, is deliberately hard to watch, and it offers no redemption arc to soften that experience.

  7. 11:09
    A hard film that earns its difficulty

    At 129 minutes it is one of the more punishing character studies on this list, and the discomfort is the result of deliberate craft rather than excess.

Worth your time?

Yes. Watch the whole thing.

4.5/ 5
What works
  • De Niro's physical transformation and performance
  • Schoonmaker's editing of the fight sequences
  • Pesci's performance as Joey
  • the black-and-white photography's period logic
What does not
  • Vickie given little interior life of her own
  • early bouts moving quickly enough that unfamiliar viewers may lose track of the stakes
Watch it if
  • viewers interested in character studies that refuse to soften a difficult lead
  • fans of boxing filmed with real formal ambition
  • anyone interested in De Niro's or Schoonmaker's craft
Skip it if
  • viewers sensitive to sustained scenes of domestic and physical abuse
  • anyone wanting a redemption arc or a triumphant sports payoff
  • those needing clearer signposting on how to feel about the lead
The written brief4 min read

A memoir turned into a study of temper

Raging Bull adapts Jake LaMotta’s own account of his career as a middleweight boxing champion into a portrait built less around his fights than around the paranoid jealousy that steadily destroys his marriage to Vickie and his working relationship with his brother and manager Joey. Scorsese, who initially turned the project down because he had no real interest in boxing, eventually found his way into the material by treating the ring as one more arena where LaMotta’s need for control and self-punishment plays out, rather than as the film’s actual subject. The structure moves between LaMotta’s rise through the ranks and his domestic life, with each professional gain accompanied by a corresponding act of damage to the people closest to him, until the two threads meet in his eventual loss of both his title and his family.

Black and white chosen for a period reason

Scorsese chose to shoot the film in black and white after his cinematographer and a mentor pointed out that period-accurate boxing gloves came in only a narrow range of colours, maroon, oxblood or black, undermining any advantage colour film would have offered for the fight scenes, and the choice also let the film sidestep the fading colour stock of the era. Robert De Niro trained as an amateur boxer for the ring sequences and later gained around 60 pounds to play LaMotta in his heavier, retired years, a transformation the production built its shooting schedule around. Joe Pesci, largely unknown and working outside the industry before the film, plays Joey with a coiled, watchful loyalty that makes his eventual break with Jake land as a real loss rather than a plot beat. Thelma Schoonmaker’s editing of the fight sequences compresses and distorts time within the ring itself, making each bout feel subjective rather than simply recorded.

A body rebuilt for one performance

The boxing sequences are staged with an unusual formal intensity, using selective slow motion, unnatural sound design and flashbulb effects to turn ring violence into something closer to LaMotta’s internal experience than a straightforward sports sequence, and Schoonmaker’s editing won the film’s only competitive Oscar beyond De Niro’s performance. The domestic scenes, particularly LaMotta’s interrogation of Vickie over an innocuous comment about a neighbour, escalate with a controlled, dreadful patience that makes his jealousy feel procedural rather than simply explosive. The closing dressing-room scene, in which an overweight, washed-up LaMotta rehearses a line from On the Waterfront in a mirror, gives the film’s final image a raw, unresolved sadness that neither excuses nor fully explains the man audiences have just spent two hours with.

A brother pushed past what loyalty can absorb

The film gives Vickie relatively little interior life of her own, showing her almost entirely through Jake’s suspicion and the audience’s growing dread on her behalf rather than through her own account of what staying with him actually costs her. Some of the earlier boxing matches, while formally inventive, move quickly enough in sequence that a viewer unfamiliar with LaMotta’s actual career may struggle to track how much time has passed or what specifically is at stake in a given bout. The film’s commitment to LaMotta’s ugliest behaviour, including his physical and verbal abuse of both his wife and his brother, is unflinching by design, but it offers little in the way of narrative signposting for a viewer wanting clearer guidance on how to feel about him at any given point.

Where the film keeps its distance

Masculinity here is bound up entirely in physical dominance and control, with LaMotta treating jealousy, violence and self-destruction as extensions of the same competitive instinct that made him a champion, unable to distinguish an opponent in the ring from a brother or a wife at home. Family loyalty is tested to its absolute limit through Joey, who tolerates years of Jake’s paranoia before a single baseless accusation of infidelity with Vickie ends the relationship permanently, a rupture the film treats as the real tragedy of LaMotta’s story rather than his loss of the title. Trauma and self-punishment run underneath the entire structure, with LaMotta’s late-career weight gain and diminished circumstances read less as decline than as a continuation of the same appetite for absorbing pain that made him formidable in the ring.

Punishing rather than crowd-pleasing

This suits viewers interested in character studies that refuse to soften or explain away a genuinely difficult central figure, and anyone drawn to boxing sequences shot with real formal ambition rather than straightforward sports coverage. It is a demanding watch for anyone sensitive to sustained scenes of domestic and physical abuse, since the film neither sanitises nor moralises over LaMotta’s behaviour toward the people who love him. Viewers wanting a redemption arc or a sports story with a triumphant emotional payoff should look elsewhere, since the film is far more interested in what winning costs LaMotta than in the winning itself.

A hard film that earns its difficulty

At 129 minutes the film builds a genuinely uncomfortable character study rather than an easy sports biopic, and its modest box office on release, later reversed by a stronger critical and cultural standing including a top-five placing on one major national film institute’s ranking, reflects a film that needed time to find its audience. De Niro’s physical transformation and Schoonmaker’s editing remain the two most immediately striking elements, but the film’s lasting power comes from its refusal to let LaMotta off the hook even as it stays inside his perspective throughout. Worth the evening for anyone prepared to spend it with a genuinely unlikeable man rendered without apology.

Same shelf · Drama4 of 73
Up next in Film

Raiders of the Lost Ark

Steven Spielberg · 1981 · 13:00

Raiders of the Lost Ark is a serial-adventure pastiche executed with more craft than its models ever had, and its achievement is almost entirely mechanical rather than dramatic.

13:00