filmbriefs
all subjects →
13:00in productionCh. 1 · A girl at an airport, deciding not to board/ 13:00 · ceiling 15 min
Animation · Drama

Persepolis

Marjane Satrapi turns her own adolescence in revolutionary Iran into black-and-white animation because, she has said, a live-action version would have made her family's story look foreign even to her.

Adapted from her own graphic novel, Marjane Satrapi and Vincent Paronnaud's 2007 film follows a girl growing up through the Iranian Revolution, the war with Iraq, and years of exile in Vienna. Hand-drawn black and white carries most of the film's argument about who this story belongs to.

Chapters & takeaways7
  1. 0:08
    A girl at an airport, deciding not to board

    The film frames its entire flashback structure around Marji standing at Orly Airport unable to get on a plane to Tehran, which turns everything that follows into an explanation she is working out for herself as much as for the audience.

  2. 1:51
    Drawn flat and deliberately imperfect

    Satrapi insisted on traditional pen-and-ink techniques over digital tools specifically so the film would keep the rough, human line of her comics rather than looking polished or exoticised.

  3. 3:43
    Why black and white, not colour

    Satrapi has explained that black and white kept her characters from reading as foreigners in a foreign country; the choice removes ethnic markup that colour and live-action casting would otherwise carry.

  4. 5:34
    A childhood that runs faster than the country around it

    Her uncle Anoosh's arrest and execution, and the disappearance of family friends, happen in scenes that move quickly, which mirrors how a child absorbs political violence without being given time to process it.

  5. 7:26
    Exile as its own kind of danger

    The Vienna section, where teenage Marji drifts between households, a failed relationship and eventually homelessness, gets as much screen time as the revolution itself, refusing to treat leaving as automatically safer than staying.

  6. 9:17
    Who this is for

    Viewers interested in modern Iranian history, coming-of-age stories that don't soften their politics, or animation aimed squarely at adults will find this rewarding; those wanting a linear history lesson or a warmer emotional register should look elsewhere.

  7. 11:09
    Ninety-five minutes worth spending

    At ninety-five minutes, co-winner of the Cannes Jury Prize and the first film to earn a woman an Academy Award nomination for Best Animated Feature, Persepolis compresses a decade of upheaval without feeling rushed.

Worth your time?

Yes. Watch the whole thing.

4.5/ 5
What works
  • the black-and-white design choice
  • the Vienna exile section
  • the framing device at the airport
  • the film's refusal to simplify its politics
What does not
  • pacing through the revolution that moves fast enough to skim some events
Watch it if
  • viewers interested in modern Iranian history
  • readers of the source graphic novel
  • fans of adult-oriented animation
  • anyone drawn to coming-of-age stories with political stakes
Skip it if
  • viewers wanting a comprehensive history lesson
  • those who prefer warmer, less austere animation styles
The written brief4 min read

A girl at an airport, deciding not to board

Persepolis, released in 2007 and co-directed by Marjane Satrapi and Vincent Paronnaud, adapts Satrapi’s own autobiographical graphic novel about growing up in Tehran during the Iranian Revolution and the war with Iraq, then living in exile in Vienna, and finally returning home again as a young woman. It is not trying to be a comprehensive history of the period, and it does not attempt to explain every political faction or event in detail; it is trying to show what that period looked like from inside one household and one child’s gradually widening understanding of it, which is a narrower and more useful ambition than the subject might suggest.

Drawn flat and deliberately imperfect

The film frames its entire story as a single afternoon spent at Orly Airport in Paris, where the adult Marjane sits down rather than boarding a flight back to Tehran and lets the rest of the film play out as an extended memory triggered by that hesitation. Satrapi and Paronnaud kept the animation hand-drawn and deliberately simple, using traditional ink techniques on paper after early digital tests looked, in the words of art director Marc Jousset, too clean and lacking in definition for what the story needed; producers had originally offered Satrapi the option of making a live-action film instead, and she turned that offer down flatly.

Why black and white, not colour

The choice to render most of the film in black and white, reserving colour only for the present-day airport scenes that bookend it, does specific work beyond simple stylisation: Satrapi has said directly that colour footage and live casting would have made her family read on screen as exotic outsiders in their own country, whereas the graphic, stripped-down line lets the audience see recognisable people rather than an unfamiliar, distancing setting. That same visual simplicity makes the political violence, when it eventually arrives on screen, land harder than it might in a more detailed style, because nothing about the animation is cushioning it with decorative visual noise.

A childhood that runs faster than the country around it

The film’s pace through the revolution itself sometimes runs faster than a viewer unfamiliar with the history can fully absorb in a single sitting; the arrest and execution of Marji’s uncle Anoosh, for instance, is compressed into a handful of scenes whose full emotional weight depends on the film having already sketched, briefly and efficiently, who he was to her and why his stories of resistance mattered. Some of that compression is simply an unavoidable cost of trying to cover roughly a decade of upheaval, migration and war within a ninety-five minute runtime without padding it out.

Exile as its own kind of danger

What the film is actually about is displacement in more than one sense at once: Marji is displaced from her country by war and government repression, and later, in Vienna, displaced again by isolation, a failed relationship with a boyfriend named Markus, and eventually a period of homelessness, before she returns to Iran no better resolved emotionally than when she originally left it. The film gives the Vienna exile section roughly as much screen time as the revolution itself, which amounts to a deliberate refusal to suggest that simply getting out of a dangerous country was ever the end of anyone’s story.

Who this is for

This suits viewers with a genuine interest in modern Iranian history told from a personal rather than a documentary or textbook angle, readers of Satrapi’s original comics curious how the adaptation compares, and anyone looking for animation made without any concession whatsoever to a younger audience. It is less suited to viewers wanting a tidy, comprehensive historical overview delivered with clear signposting, or those who prefer a gentler emotional register; the film does not soften its politics or its family’s real losses for the sake of viewer comfort. Anyone hoping for a documentary-style survey of the revolution’s causes and factions should look elsewhere for that context first.

Ninety-five minutes worth spending

At ninety-five minutes, co-winner of the Jury Prize at the Cannes Film Festival and the film that made Satrapi the first woman ever nominated for the Best Animated Feature Academy Award, Persepolis earns its considerable acclaim by trusting one specific, sometimes uncomfortable personal story over a broader, more sweeping historical account. It is a demanding but tightly efficient use of an evening, and unlike many films built around a decade of upheaval, it never once repeats a beat it has already made. It went on to become France’s official submission for the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar the same year, which says something about how thoroughly it was embraced at home despite its subject.

Same shelf · Animation4 of 95
Up next in Film

Persona

Ingmar Bergman · 1966 · 13:00

An actress stops speaking mid-performance and never explains why, and the nurse sent to care for her starts talking enough for both of them.

13:00